Proximity effect in e-beam lithography is mainly due to the “nonideal” distribution of exposure (energy deposited in the resist). The proximity effect correction schemes developed so far employ a two-dimensional (2D) model, i.e., exposure variation along the resist depth dimension is not considered. The exposure distribution estimated by the 2D model can be significantly different from the actual exposure distribution, especially for the nanoscale patterns. In this article, a three-dimensional (3D) correction method which uses a 3D point spread function in controlling e-beam dose distribution within each circuit feature in order to achieve a certain desired 3D remaining resist profile after development is described. The dose to be given to each region of a feature is determined based on the estimated remaining resist profile (with the emphasis on the sidewall shape) through iterations. Simulation results demonstrating the potential improvements by the 3D correction are provided.
Yuteng ZhangZhuming LiuXihui LiangKaiyao WangQuantong Li
Kozo OginoHiromi HoshinoYasuhide MachidaMorimi OsawaHiroshi ArimotoTakashi MaruyamaEiichi Kawamura
Paul A. VermeulenR. JonckheereLuc Van den hove
T. KatoYaichiro WatakabeH. Nakata