Rechargeable lithium-carbon dioxide (Li-CO2) batteries are promising for CO2 capture and energy storage. However, the high decomposition potential and sluggish kinetics of the discharge product Li2CO3 limit their practical development. Recent studies have identified Li2C2O4 as an alternative with superior electrochemical decomposition properties. While the nucleation mechanism of Li2C2O4 has been well-studied, its decomposition mechanism remains unclear. This work comprehensively examines the physical and chemical differences between Li2CO3 and Li2C2O4. Both compounds exhibit insulating electronic structures, with rapid lithium diffusion occurring in the presence of lithium vacancies. Bonding analysis reveals that the C-C covalent bonds within the C2O4 groups are key to differentiating the two compounds. The weakly bonded C2O4 group lowers the decomposition potential of Li2C2O4, allowing its chemical release as CO2 without an energy barrier after delithiation. Climbing image nudged elastic band calculations show that the sluggish decomposition of Li2CO3 results from the cooperative dissociation of two CO3 groups. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations indicate that CO3 dissociates slowly after delithiation, while C2O4 dissociates simultaneously with delithiation, leading to fast and continuous decomposition of Li2C2O4. This study offers mechanistic insights into the decomposition of Li-CO2 discharge products and guides strategies to enhance Li-CO2 battery performance.
Lixin Xiong (12848664)Neil Qiang Su (1494913)
Yu QiaoYi JinShaohua GuoYang‐Kook SunShichao WuXizheng LiuSixie YangPing HeHaoshen Zhou
Yanli ChenJunfeng LiBingyi LuYingqi LiuRui MaoYanze SongHongtai LiXinqian YuYongzheng GaoQiong PengXiaosi QiGuangmin Zhou
Pamangadan C. SharafudeenSnehangshu PatraPerumal Elumalai
Bianca P. SousaChayene G. AnchietaThayane Carpanedo de Morais NepelAlex R. NealeLaurence J. HardwickRubens Maciel FilhoGustavo Doubek