Basically, compensation is a civil case. However, once the criminal law law is applied, compensation can be made in conjunction with a criminal case. Although claims of merger compensation in a criminal case have been written in criminal law, this type of case is hardly found in court. This research proposes to answer 3 (three) problems related to the implementation of the merger claims for compensation (1) the conduct of examination of the merger claims for compensation in a criminal case in Class I Court of B Bukittinggi; (2) judges' consideration in making decisions in cases where compensation is combined with a criminal case in Class I Court of B Bukittinggi; (3) obstacles in conducting examination of merger claims for compensation in a criminal case in Class I Court of B Bukittinggi. obstacles encountered in the implementation of the merger of the indemnification lawsuits in the criminal case at the IB Negeri Bukittinggi State Court are: a) Lack of public knowledge; b) have made a peace effort by replacing all losses suffered by the victim (material loss); c) Judge's consideration of the economic level of the defendant who has been sued for damages by the plaintiff or victim; d) Plaintiff or victim must be able to prove the total loss he or she has suffered.
Nafrali Cahya Putri PrakosoMuriani
Rahman AminIren ManaluWinda Apricilya Van HemertMuh Fikri Al Aziz
Rahman AminIren ManaluWinda Apricilya Van HemertMuh Fikri Al Aziz