BOOK-CHAPTER

Lexical anisomorphism in machine-readable dictionaries

Danko Šipka

Year: 2015 Cambridge University Press eBooks Pages: 208-215   Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Abstract

Natural-language-processing knowledge bases are substantially different from textual dictionaries in one important regard. Owing to the lack of text–human communication, all those strategies that rely on human reasoning are impossible in NLP knowledge bases. Thus, for example, explanation, specification, exemplification, and illustration cannot be used.

Keywords:
Exemplification Computer science Natural language processing Artificial intelligence Natural (archaeology) Linguistics Biology Philosophy

Metrics

0
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.29
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Topics

Natural Language Processing Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
linguistics and terminology studies
Social Sciences →  Arts and Humanities →  Language and Linguistics
Lexicography and Language Studies
Social Sciences →  Arts and Humanities →  Language and Linguistics

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

EQUIVALENCE AND LEXICAL ANISOMORPHISM IN BILINGUAL DICTIONARIES

Danko Šipka

Journal:   Lomonosov Journal of Philology Year: 2024 Pages: 54-66
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Machine-readable dictionaries

Donald E. Walker

Year: 1984 Pages: 457-457
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Machine-readable dictionaries

Donald E. Walker

Year: 1984 Pages: 457-457
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.