JOURNAL ARTICLE

Text‐related variables in textbook readability

James Poon Teng Fatt

Year: 1991 Journal:   Research Papers in Education Vol: 6 (3)Pages: 225-245   Publisher: Taylor & Francis

Abstract

Abstract Text‐related variables such as sentence complexity and vocabulary load were examined in three secondary‐school human and social biology textbooks. Content and non‐content words, technical (including biological words) and non‐technical words, rare and frequent words, and word repetitions were considered. These were intercorrelated with readability estimates from teacher and student judgements, a cloze test, and a Fry graph to establish the significance of these variables in readability. The study involved 397 ‘secondary three’ students in ‘express’ classes from five, English‐stream, government secondary schools, and 85 biology teachers from 133 secondary schools in Singapore. Ten cloze tests with every fifth‐word deletions were administered to the students, and marked by exact‐word scoring. The response to six Likert‐type items on the language of the passages was elicited from students at the time of the cloze tests, and from teachers through a postal questionnaire. Word frequency in the cloze passages was established by the Standard Frequency Index. Words were classified into technical, non‐technical, and biological by reference to scientific dictionaries. Counts were made of the repetition of rare and frequent words, content (technical and non‐technical) words, and non‐content words. Sentence complexity was examined by mean sentence length and the Structural Index. The readability of these textbooks was found to be at the frustration reading level of the students. Sentence length was inadequate as a measure of syntactical complexity or textual difficulty. Of the variables examined, only teachers’ judgement on language correlated significantly with the cloze scores. The percentage of technical or biological words, and the repetition of content (technical and non‐technical) words were low. Student judgements on language were much influenced by technical or non‐technical words, and the repetition of technical content words and rare words. However, these variables could not account for the students’ cloze performance. Students judged the language of the passages as difficult when the repetition of technical content words and rare words was high.

Keywords:
Readability Sentence Cloze test Vocabulary Psychology Reading (process) Mathematics education Test (biology) Likert scale Computer science Linguistics Natural language processing Reading comprehension Developmental psychology

Metrics

6
Cited By
0.44
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
53
Refs
0.72
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Topics

Text Readability and Simplification
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Reading and Literacy Development
Social Sciences →  Psychology →  Developmental and Educational Psychology
Educational Methods and Media Use
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Information Systems

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

READABILITY OF TEXTBOOK VS LINUS SCREENING TEXT

Cleopatra CharlesMelor Md Yunus

Journal:   International Journal for Innovation Education and Research Year: 2019 Vol: 7 (1)Pages: 203-209
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Text Readability Level Investigation about Biology Subjects-related Units in 'Science 7 Textbook'

Şeyda GülPınar Deniz Kargin

Journal:   Journal of Science Learning Year: 2021 Vol: 4 (4)Pages: 347-356
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Text readability

Daniel L. Turner

Journal:   Nature Year: 1992 Vol: 357 (6380)Pages: 622-622
JOURNAL ARTICLE

CLASSIFYING THE READABILITY LEVEL OF READING TEXT ON ENGLISH TEXTBOOK ENTITLED “PATHWAY TO ENGLISH”

Ulfa Rahmi

Journal:   TELL-US JOURNAL Year: 2022 Vol: 8 (1)Pages: 1-10
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.