David W. JohnsonRoger T. JohnsonLinda E. Scott
Summary The way in which learning goals are structured determines the student-student and teacher-student interaction patterns in the classroom, which in turn greatly affect the outcomes resulting from instruction. The effects of two methods of structuring learning goals—cooperatively and individualistically—were compared on a series of attitudinal and performance variables. An advanced math class for 5th and 6th grade white students (N = 30 boys and girls) in a suburban, upper-middle-class school was divided randomly into cooperative and individualized conditions (controlling for math ability) for studying math one hour a day for 50 days. The results indicate that cooperative learning promoted more positive attitudes towards heterogeneity among peers; higher self-esteem; more positive attitudes toward the teacher, fellow cooperators, and conflict; more internal locus of control; and higher daily achievement.
Robert E. SlavinMarshall LeaveyNancy A. Madden
David JohnsonRoger T. JohnsonJeannette L. JohnsonDouglas R. Anderson
David W. JohnsonRoger T. JohnsonJeannette L. JohnsonDouglas Anderson
Izuegbunam Arinze GabrielAbigail M. OsuaforNwanze Azubuike CorneliusPius Promise ObinnaEmerhiona Francis