Gábor Benkö (2987031)Pasi Myllyperkiö (2483338)Jie Pan (187977)Arkady P. Yartsev (2204899)Villy Sundström (2486869)
Photoinduced electron injection from the sensitizer Ru(dcbpy)<sub>2</sub>(NCS)<sub>2</sub> (RuN3) into SnO<sub>2</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> nanocrystalline films occurs by two distinct channels on the femto- and picosecond time scales. The faster electron injection into the conduction band of the different semiconductors originates from the initially excited singlet state of RuN3, and occurs in competition with intersystem crossing. The rate of singlet electron injection is faster to TiO<sub>2</sub> (1/55 fs<sup>-1</sup>) than to SnO<sub>2</sub> (1/145 fs<sup>-1</sup>), in agreement with higher density of conduction band acceptor states in the former semiconductor. As a result of competition between the ultrafast processes, for TiO<sub>2</sub> singlet, whereas for SnO<sub>2</sub> triplet electron injection is dominant. Electron injection from the triplet state is nonexponential and can be fitted with time constants ranging from ∼1 ps (2.5 ps for SnO<sub>2</sub>) to ∼50 ps for both semiconductors. The major part of triplet injection is independent of the semiconductor and is most likely controlled by intramolecular dynamics in RuN3. The overall time scale and the yield of electron injection to the two semiconductors are very similar, suggesting that processes other than electron injection are responsible for the difference in efficiencies of solar cells made of these materials.
Jani Kallioinen (1677823)Gábor Benkö (2987031)Villy Sundström (2486869)Jouko E. I. Korppi-Tommola (1268538)Arkady P. Yartsev (2204899)
Chiara Massera (547887)Gernot Frenking (1569796)
Werner E. van ZylJosé M. López‐de‐LuzuriagaJohn P. FacklerRichard J. Staples
Jeongho Yeon (1406326)Sang-Hwan Kim (527119)Sau Doan Nguyen (1985821)Hana Lee (445860)P. Shiv Halasyamani (1261704)
Akira KishiokaShinzi UEKIMamoru AizawaKiyoshi ItataniF. Scott Howell