Md AnnaduzzamanL.C. RietveldBilqis Amin HoqueMd. Niamul BariDoris van Halem
Generally, abstracted groundwater is aerated, leading to iron (Fe 2+ ) oxidation to Fe 3+ and precipitation as Fe 3+ -(hydr)oxide (HFO) flocs.This practice of passive groundwater treatment, however, is not considered a barrier for arsenic (As), as removal efficiencies vary widely (15-95%), depending on Fe/As ratio.This study hypothesizes that full utilization of the adsorption capacity of groundwater native-Fe 2+ based HFO flocs is hampered by rapid Fe 2+ oxidation-precipitation during aeration before or after storage.Therefore, delaying Fe 2+ oxidation by the introduction of an anoxic storage step before aeration-filtration was investigated for As(III) oxidation and removal in Rajshahi (Bangladesh) with natural groundwater containing 329(±0.05)µgAs/L.The results indicated that As(III) oxidation in the oxic storage was higher with complete and rapid Fe 2+ oxidation (2±0.01 mg/ L) than in the anoxic storage system, where Fe 2+ oxidation was partial (1.03±0.32mg/L), but the oxidized As (V)/Fe removal ratio was comparatively higher for the anoxic storage system.The low pH (6.9) and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration (0.24 mg/L) in the anoxic storage limited the rapid oxidation of Fe 2+ and facilitated more As(V) removal.The groundwater native-Fe 2+ (2.33±0.03mg/L) removed 61% of As in the oxic system (storage-aeration-filtration), whereas 92% As removal was achieved in the anoxic system.
Md AnnaduzzamanL.C. RietveldBilqis Amin HoqueMd. Niamul BariDoris van Halem
Md AnnaduzzamanL.C. RietveldBilqis Amin HoqueMd. Niamul BariDoris van Halem
Rakesh Chandra VaishyaSudhir Kumar Gupta
Karolina ŚmiechAize TolsmaT. KovácsVlade DalboscoKamuran YasadiLeo GroendijkLuewton L. F. Agostinho
Krzysztof P. KowalskiKatarzyna ArturiErik Gydesen Søgaard