Sascha Berger (2961123)Axel Klein (1938667)Matthias Wanner (2679079)Wolfgang Kaim (1507327)Jan Fiedler (1597090)
Electrochemical reduction of the dinuclear [(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)ClM(μ-L)MCl(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> ions (M = Rh, Ir; L = 2,5-bis(1-phenyliminoethyl)pyrazine (bpip) and 2,5-bis[1-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)iminoethyl]pyrazine (bxip)) proceeds\nvia the paramagnetic intermediates [(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)ClM(μ-L)MCl(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)]<sup>+</sup> (L = bpip) or [(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)M(μ-L)MCl(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)]<sup>2+</sup> (L = bxip) and [(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)M(μ-L)M(η<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)]<sup>+</sup>. Whereas the first is clearly a radical species\nwith a small <i>g</i> anisotropy, the chloride-free cations are distinguished by structured intervalence charge transfer\n(IVCT) bands in the near-infrared region and by rhombic electron paramagnetic resonance features between <i>g</i> =\n1.9 and <i>g</i> = 2.3, which suggests considerable metal participation at the singly occupied MO. Alternatives for the\nd configuration assignment and for the role of the bisbidentate-conjugated bridging ligands will be discussed.\nThe main difference between bpip and bxip systems is the destabilization of the chloride-containing forms through\nthe bxip ligand for reasons of steric interference.
Diego del Rio (2379640)Irene Resa (2185630)Amor Rodriguez (2413225)Luis Sánchez (1442299)Ralf Köppe (1655098)Anthony J. Downs (2197102)Christina Y. Tang (2017882)Ernesto Carmona (1522156)
Krishna K. Pandey (571498)Agustí Lledós (1359021)Feliu Maseras (1347684)
J. Monte Russell (2981880)Michal Sabat (1385655)Russell N. Grimes (2708200)
Robert M. Fairchild (2253289)K. Travis Holman (1487371)
Prasenjit Das (2576863)Pratim Kumar Chattaraj (2022292)