S. R. Gowda (1292022)A. Brunet (1292016)G. M. Wallraff (1292019)B. D. McCloskey (1277835)
In this Letter, the effect of CO<sub>2</sub> contamination\non nonaqueous\nLi–O<sub>2</sub> battery rechargeability is explored. Although\nCO<sub>2</sub> contamination was found to increase the cell’s\ndischarge capacity, it also spontaneously reacts with Li<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (the primary discharge product of a nonaqueous Li–O<sub>2</sub> battery) to form Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>. CO<sub>2</sub> evolution from Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> during battery charging\nwas found to occur only at very high potentials (>4 V) compared\nto\nO<sub>2</sub> evolution from Li<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (∼3–3.5\nV), and as a result, the presence of CO<sub>2</sub> during discharge\ndramatically reduced the voltaic efficiency of the discharge–charge\ncycle. These results emphasize the importance of not only completely\nremoving CO<sub>2</sub> from air fed to a Li-air battery, but also\ndeveloping stable cathodes and electrolytes that will not decompose\nduring battery operation to form carbonate deposits.
А. С. ТолкачеваM. А. Konopel’ko
ShinYoung Kang (1847689)Yifei Mo (281391)Shyue Ping Ong (1350279)Gerbrand Ceder (380361)
Hairong WangJun RenGuo Liang SunDi Cen
Xiangming HeWei PuFang ZhaoJie YingChang Yin JiangChun Rong WanShi Chao Zhang
Mengwei Yuan (4334875)Caiyun Nan (1829335)Yan Yang (33204)Genban Sun (1483066)Huifeng Li (1908337)Shulan Ma (1508938)