Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) in peripheral and coronary arterial interventions A systematic review

Michael D. Weiss

doi:10.52768/2379-1039/2349

ScienceGate Book Chapters

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) in peripheral and coronary arterial interventions A systematic review

Michael D. Weiss

Year: 2025 Journal: Open Journal of Clinical and Medical Case Reports Vol: 11 (1)

DOI: 10.52768/2379-1039/2349

Get Full-Text PDF Get Analytical Report

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review is to compare Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) diagnostic performance and clinical effectiveness in Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI).

Keywords:

Metrics

Cited By

0.00

FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)

Refs

0.59

Citation Normalized Percentile

Is in top 1%

Is in top 10%

Topics

Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Health Sciences → Medicine → Surgery

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) in peripheral and coronary arterial interventions A systematic review

Abstract

Metrics

Topics

Related Documents

Diagnostic accuracy of integrated intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography (IVUS-OCT) system for coronary plaque characterization

Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Case Study – Australian First Comparison

Novel biomedical imaging that combines intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)

Intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography

TCT-369 Human coronary plaque characterization using a fully integrated intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography (IVUS-OCT) system