Abdulhamit Şehid KılınçÖmer Faruk BoranFeyza Çalışır
Background: This study aimed to compare sedation methods in pediatric patients undergoing mag-netic resonance imaging (MRI) using three different anesthetic agents (sevoflurane, thiopental, and propofol) regarding safety, efficacy, time management, and side effects. Materials and Methods: An observational study was conducted with 126 pediatric patients divided into three groups, each receiving one of the three sedative agents: Group S (n = 43), Group T (n = 41), and Group P (n = 42). Patients in Group S received induction with 8% sevoflurane, Group T received 5 mg kg1 of thiopental intravenously, and Group P received 2 mg kg-1 of propofol intrave-nously, followed by maintenance via infusion. Results: The mean age was 37.3 ± 2 months. Cranial MRI was most frequently requested (64.5%). Group P had higher desaturation (p = 0.029) and respiratory depression (p = 0.008) rates. Group T had the shortest induction time (p <0.001), while Group S showed the fastest wake-up times (p = 0.002; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Sevoflurane is distinguished by its rapid emergence from sedation and low incidence of side effects. Thiopental has a quick induction time, whereas propofol is associated with minimal agitation but higher respiratory complications. These findings can guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate sedation method for pediatric MRI.
Demet AltunTülay Özkan SeyhanGiray VaransuAli Emre Çamcı
Wen‐Hua ZhangYan-Ting FanTianyun ZhaoJinghui ChenGaolong ZhangXingrong Song
Tahsin ŞimşekHande GürbüzMehmet Birhan YılmazAynur Kaynar ŞimşekAyşe Zeynep TuranKemal Tolga Saraçoglu
İlker Öngüç AycanYesim TaseliHakan TemelBora DinçNesil CoşkunfıratSuat Sanlı