Suhermita SihombingVanita Deben SimanjuntakYoga Baheramsyah
This article presents the results of an analysis of the alleged defamation case of Marissa Icha by Medina Zein. As a form of forensic linguistics study, the data in this research was analyzed descriptively-analytically using semantic and pragmatic approaches. This research found that 1) semantically, the defendants indicated that they intended to commit acts of insult and/or defamation. 2) pragmatically, the majority of these utterances fell into the form of expressive illocutions, especially to show anger or simply the personal opinion of the defendant, and thus, 3) these speeches can be said to have the potential to violate article 27 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law and articles 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code
Suhermita SihombingVanita Deben SimanjuntakYoga Baheramsyah
Fadillah HasanahAyu PatmawatiRomayana SinuratYoseva SimanjuntakFransiska Fera HomerLidia HutabaratOktaviani Rahmatin RambeMustaid Siregar
Amanda Putri SyanataDina MulianaFitri AndiniGita MelindaNissa Azahra TanjungRirin ApriliaMustika Wati Siregar
Adinda LarasatiKiki AsrinaMaharani Br MalauRizki Wahyudi NasutionYessi Elfrida Br SimanjuntakNovita Dame SamosirMustaid SiregarWisman Hadi