Abstract Localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) have emerged as a promising class of electrolytes to improve the cycle life and energy density of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs). While their application in batteries with lithium‐metal anodes is extensively investigated, their behavior in systems with graphite anodes has received less research attention. Herein, the behaviors of four electrolytes in Graphite | LiNiO 2 cells are compared. By systematically varying the electrolyte compositions, the impacts of the solvation structure, solvent composition, and salt composition of LHCEs are identified on the rate capability, stability, and propensity for lithium plating in LIB full‐cells. It is found that while the solvation structure and solvent composition each play an important role in determining rate capability, the substitution of LiPF 6 salt with LiFSI maximizes the rate capability and suppresses irreversible lithium plating. It is now demonstrated via constant‐potential cycling, that an appropriately formulated LHCE can, therefore, maintain high reversible capacity and safety under arbitrarily fast charging conditions.
Seungsoo ParkHongjun ChangHyuntae LeeMinhong LimHyeongguk AnJiwoong KangSoyeon LeeMingyu LeeCheolhee HanHochun LeeSujong ChaeJanghyuk MoonHongkyung LeeJanghyuk MoonHongkyung LeeHongkyung Lee
Jingru YangXi-Xiu ShiWenyang WangZhaoping LiuCai Shen
Xia CaoHao JiaWu XuJi‐Guang Zhang
Guohong ShenShinji KondouGakuto WadaHiroki NakagakiMasayoshi WatanabeKaoru DokkoKazuhide Ueno
Peter HilbigLukas IbingMartin WinterIsidora Cekić-Lasković