JOURNAL ARTICLE

URGENSI PEMBENTUKAN MAJELIS HAKIM AD HOC MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PERKARA JUDICIAL REVIEW

Abstract

This research employs a juridical-normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a case approach to explore the procedure for establishing the Ad Hoc Panel of the Constitutional Court as a response to violations of the principle of nemo judex in causa sua. The aim of this research is to outline the procedure for establishing the Ad Hoc Panel of the Constitutional Court and its implications for maintaining the integrity of the Constitutional Court. The formation of the Ad Hoc Panel of the Constitutional Court is a relevant alternative in this context. Ad Hoc Judges, selected based on their expertise and specialized experience in constitutional law, can assist in handling complex or sensitive cases without conflicts of interest that would compromise the judicial process. These measures are expected to enhance the integrity and credibility of the Constitutional Court, enabling it to fulfill its functions as an upholder of the constitution free from external influence, and strengthen public trust in the constitutional justice system. Despite challenges in implementing this mechanism, such as the proper selection of Ad Hoc Judges and oversight mechanisms, these steps are crucial in ensuring the enforcement of the principle of nemo judex in causa sua Abstrak Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach) untuk mengeksplorasi prosedur pembentukan Majelis Hakim Ad Hoc Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai respons terhadap pelanggaran asas nemo judex in causa sua. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguraikan prosedur pembentukan Majelis Hakim Ad Hoc Mahkamah Konstitusi serta implikasinya dalam menjaga integritas Mahkamah Konstitusi. Pembentukan Majelis Hakim Ad Hoc Mahkamah Konstitusi menjadi alternatif yang relevan dalam konteks ini. Hakim Ad Hoc, dipilih berdasarkan keahlian dan pengalaman khusus di bidang hukum konstitusi, dapat membantu menangani perkara-perkara kompleks atau sensitif tanpa adanya konflik kepentingan yang merugikan proses peradilan. Langkah-langkah ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan integritas dan kredibilitas Mahkamah Konstitusi, menjalankan fungsi-fungsinya sebagai lembaga penegak konstitusi yang bebas dari pengaruh eksternal, serta memperkuat kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem peradilan konstitusi. Meskipun masih terdapat tantangan dalam implementasi mekanisme ini, seperti pemilihan hakim Ad Hoc yang tepat dan mekanisme pengawasannya.

Keywords:
Political science

Metrics

0
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.19
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Topics

Legal Studies and Policies
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Law
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Political Science and International Relations
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Political Science and International Relations

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Pembentukan Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawas Etik Hakim Konstitusi

Rahmad Andika Abay

Journal:   WELFARE STATE Jurnal Hukum Year: 2025 Vol: 4 (1)Pages: 67-80
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pseudo Judicial Review dalam Perkara Pemilukada

Irfan Nur Rachman

Journal:   Jurnal Konstitusi Year: 2016 Vol: 12 (1)Pages: 154-154
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Urgensi Judicial Review Satu Atap Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi

Tenri Wulan Aris

Journal:   de Jure Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Year: 2020 Vol: 1 (2)Pages: 142-142
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.