Grinding performance investigation of multidirectional CF/PEEK composites—A comparative with unidirectional CF/PEEK

Abstract

Abstract To distinguish the grinding performance of the multidirectional (MD) and unidirectional (UD) carbon fiber‐reinforced thermoplastic (CFRTP) composites, MD and UD carbon fiber‐reinforced poly‐etherether‐ketone (CF/PEEK) composites were employed in this study. Different ply stacking sequences and process parameters were set for grinding experiments. Subsequently, the surface morphologies and roughness were observed and measured. Experimental results indicated that the variations of grinding forces with grinding parameters of MD‐CF/PEEK and UD‐CF/PEEK were consistent. However, the heat transfer mechanism and the effects of grinding parameters on the maximum grinding temperatures were different between the two composites. The grinding forces and temperatures of MD‐CF/PEEK were slightly lower than UD‐CF/PEEK, and MD‐CF/PEEK reached better surface quality under the same parameters, indicating that the grinding performance of MD‐CF/PEEK was not the simple superposition of UD‐CF/PEEK. In addition, the chip formation and material removal mechanism of CF/PEEK were investigated. The grinding performance of MD‐CF/PEEK was primarily dependent on the θ elements of laminate while the grinding performance of UD‐CF/PEEK was closely related to the fiber orientation angles during grinding. This study established a more in‐depth understanding into the grinding performance of MD‐CF/PEEK and provided technical guidance for high‐quality grinding of CFRTP. Highlights The grinding performance of the multidirectional (MD) and unidirectional (UD) carbon fiber‐reinforced poly‐etherether‐ketone (CF/PEEK) is compared. The grinding forces and temperatures of MD‐CF/PEEK are slightly lower than that of UD‐CF/PEEK, and the MD‐CF/PEEK reach a better surface quality under the same grinding parameters. The grinding performance of MD‐CF/PEEK is primarily dependent on the θ elements of laminate, and the change of layering order is not a critical factor. The grinding performance of UD‐CF/PEEK is closely related to the fiber orientation angles during the grinding process. The surface quality of MD‐CFRTP can be effectively improved by reducing the grinding depth and feed speed, and increasing the grinding wheel speed.