JOURNAL ARTICLE

HutCRS: Hierarchical User-Interest Tracking for Conversational Recommender System

Abstract

Conversational Recommender System (CRS) aims to explicitly acquire user preferences towards items and attributes through natural language conversations. However, existing CRS methods ask users to provide explicit answers (yes/no) for each attribute they require, regardless of users' knowledge or interest, which may significantly reduce the user experience and semantic consistency. Furthermore, these methods assume that users like all attributes of the target item and dislike those unrelated to it, which can introduce bias in attribute-level feedback and impede the system's ability to accurately identify the target item. To address these issues, we propose a more realistic, user-friendly, and explainable CRS framework called Hierarchical User-Interest Tracking for Conversational Recommender System (HutCRS). HutCRS portrays the conversation as a hierarchical interest tree that consists of two stages. In stage I, the system identifies the aspects that the user prefers while the system asks about attributes related to these positive aspects or recommends items in stage II. In addition, we develop a Hierarchical-Interest Policy Learning (HIPL) module to integrate the decision-making process of which aspects to ask and when to ask about attributes or recommend items. Moreover, we classify the attribute-level feedback results to further enhance the system's ability to capture special information, such as attribute instances that are accepted by users but not presented in their historical interactive data. Extensive experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of our method. The implementation of HutCRS is publicly available at https://github.com/xinle1129/HutCRS.

Keywords:
Computer science Recommender system Ask price Benchmark (surveying) Consistency (knowledge bases) Conversation Process (computing) Information retrieval Tree (set theory) Human–computer interaction Artificial intelligence

Metrics

11
Cited By
6.80
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
23
Refs
0.96
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Recommender Systems and Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Information Systems
Topic Modeling
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Information Systems
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.