JOURNAL ARTICLE

Enhancing Adversarial Robustness of Multi-modal Recommendation via Modality Balancing

Abstract

Recently multi-modal recommender systems have been widely applied in real scenarios such as e-commerce businesses. Existing multi-modal recommendation methods exploit the multi-modal content of items as auxiliary information and fuse them to boost performance. Despite the superior performance achieved by multi-modal recommendation models, there's currently no understanding of their robustness to adversarial attacks. In this work, we first identify the vulnerability of existing multi-modal recommendation models. Next, we show the key reason for such vulnerability is modality imbalance, i.e., the prediction score margin between positive and negative samples in the sensitive modality will drop dramatically facing adversarial attacks and fail to be compensated by other modalities. Finally, based on this finding we propose a novel defense method to enhance the robustness of multi-modal recommendation models through modality balancing. Specifically, we first adopt an embedding distillation to obtain a pair of content-similar but prediction-different item embeddings in the sensitive modality and calculate the score margin reflecting the modality vulnerability. Then we optimize the model to utilize the score margin between positive and negative samples in other modalities to compensate for the vulnerability. The proposed method can serve as a plug-and-play module and is flexible to be applied to a wide range of multi-modal recommendation models. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets demonstrate that our method significantly improves the robustness of multi-modal recommendation models with nearly no performance degradation on clean data.

Keywords:
Modal Computer science Robustness (evolution) Modality (human–computer interaction) Exploit Modalities Vulnerability (computing) Adversarial system Margin (machine learning) Artificial intelligence Machine learning Data mining Computer security

Metrics

8
Cited By
4.95
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
43
Refs
0.94
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Recommender Systems and Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Information Systems
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Topic Modeling
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.