Abstract Recently, physics‐informed neural networks (PINNs) have been effectively utilized in a wide range of problems within the domains of applied mathematics and engineering. In PINNs, the governing physical equations are directly incorporated into the loss function of the network and a conventional labeled dataset is not required for its training. In order to successfully simulate the additive manufacturing processes with concrete, a novel process‐based FE‐simulation has been developed where the Drucker–Prager plasticity model is used as the material model. In this work, we will examine the deployment of a PINN to substitute the Newton–Raphson iterations that occur in the return‐mapping algorithm of the Drucker–Prager plasticity model.
Shuheng LiaoTianju XueJihoon JeongSamantha WebsterKornel F. EhmannJian Cao
Mattia GalantiMark JanssenIvo RoghairJean‐Yves DieulotPejman Shoeibi OmraniJurriaan BoonM. van Sint Annaland
Nathaniel MichekPiyush M. MehtaWade Huebsch