Inconsistency-tolerant semantics have been proposed to provide meaningful ontological query answers even in the presence of inconsistencies. Several such semantics rely on the notion of a repair, which is a "maximal" consistent subset of the database, where different maximality criteria might be adopted depending on the application at hand. Previous work in the context of Datalog+/- has considered only the subset and cardinality maximality criteria. We take here a step further and study inconsistency-tolerant semantics under maximality criteria based on weights and priority levels. We provide a thorough complexity analysis for a wide range of existential rule languages and for several complexity measures.
Thomas LukasiewiczEnrico MaliziaAndrius Vaicenavičius
Thomas LukasiewiczMaría Vanina MartínezGerardo I. Simari
Thomas LukasiewiczEnrico MaliziaCristian Molinaro
Thomas LukasiewiczMaría Vanina MartínezGerardo I. Simari
Jean François BagetSalem BenferhatZied BouraouiMadalina CroitoruMarie-Laure MugnierOdile PapiniSwan RocherKarim Tabia