JOURNAL ARTICLE

Convolutional Neural Network Outperforms Graph Neural Network on the Spatially Variant Graph Data

Anna BoroninaVladimir MaksimenkoAlexander E. Hramov

Year: 2023 Journal:   Mathematics Vol: 11 (11)Pages: 2515-2515   Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

Abstract

Applying machine learning algorithms to graph-structured data has garnered significant attention in recent years due to the prevalence of inherent graph structures in real-life datasets. However, the direct application of traditional deep learning algorithms, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), is limited as they are designed for regular Euclidean data like 2D grids and 1D sequences. In contrast, graph-structured data are in a non-Euclidean form. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are specifically designed to handle non-Euclidean data and make predictions based on connectivity rather than spatial structure. Real-life graph data can be broadly categorized into two types: spatially-invariant graphs, where the link structure between nodes is independent of their spatial positions, and spatially-variant graphs, where node positions provide additional information about the graph’s properties. However, there is limited understanding of the effect of spatial variance on the performance of Graph Neural Networks. In this study, we aim to address this issue by comparing the performance of GNNs and CNNs on spatially-variant and spatially-invariant graph data. In the case of spatially-variant graphs, when represented as adjacency matrices, they can exhibit Euclidean-like spatial structure. Based on this distinction, we hypothesize that CNNs may outperform GNNs when working with spatially-variant graphs, while GNNs may excel on spatially-invariant graphs. To test this hypothesis, we compared the performance of CNNs and GNNs under two scenarios: (i) graphs in the training and test sets had the same connectivity pattern and spatial structure, and (ii) graphs in the training and test sets had the same connectivity pattern but different spatial structures. Our results confirmed that the presence of spatial structure in a graph allows for the effective use of CNNs, which may even outperform GNNs. Thus, our study contributes to the understanding of the effect of spatial graph structure on the performance of machine learning methods and allows for the selection of an appropriate algorithm based on the spatial properties of the real-life graph dataset.

Keywords:
Computer science Convolutional neural network Graph Euclidean geometry Adjacency matrix Theoretical computer science Graph property Artificial intelligence Line graph Pattern recognition (psychology) Voltage graph Mathematics

Metrics

4
Cited By
1.96
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
30
Refs
0.83
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Transportation
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Physics and Astronomy →  Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Graph Convolutional Neural Network

Michael EdwardsXianghua Xie

Year: 2016 Pages: 114.1-114.11
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Neighborhood convolutional graph neural network

Jinsong ChenBoyu LiKun He

Journal:   Knowledge-Based Systems Year: 2024 Vol: 295 Pages: 111861-111861
BOOK-CHAPTER

Temporal-spatial quantum graph convolutional neural network

Zhiguo Qu

Elsevier eBooks Year: 2025 Pages: 51-68
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.