Simultaneous evaluation of treatment efficacy and toxicity for bispecific T‐cell engager therapeutics in a humanized mouse model

Abstract

Abstract Immuno‐oncology (IO)‐based therapies such as checkpoint inhibitors, bi‐specific antibodies, and CAR‐T‐cell therapies have shown significant success in the treatment of several cancer indications. However, these therapies can result in the development of severe adverse events, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Currently, there is a paucity of in vivo models that can evaluate dose‐response relationships for both tumor control and CRS‐related safety issues. We tested an in vivo PBMC humanized mouse model to assess both treatment efficacy against specific tumors and the concurrent cytokine release profiles for individual human donors after treatment with a CD19xCD3 bispecific T‐cell engager (BiTE). Using this model, we evaluated tumor burden, T‐cell activation, and cytokine release in response to bispecific T‐cell‐engaging antibody in humanized mice generated with different PBMC donors. The results show that PBMC engrafted NOD‐ scid Il2rg null mice lacking expression of mouse MHC class I and II (NSG‐MHC‐DKO mice) and implanted with a tumor xenograft predict both efficacy for tumor control by CD19xCD3 BiTE and stimulated cytokine release. Moreover, our findings indicate that this PBMC‐engrafted model captures variability among donors for tumor control and cytokine release following treatment. Tumor control and cytokine release were reproducible for the same PBMC donor in separate experiments. The PBMC humanized mouse model described here is a sensitive and reproducible platform that identifies specific patient/cancer/therapy combinations for treatment efficacy and development of complications.