Parasian SilitongaMitra HasibuanZ SitumorangDesinta PurbaB ChenH HeJ GuoH KhanD PeacockA ChongB LiE NgaiE Ch'ngF LeeJ SauraA Reyes-MenendezP Palos-SanchezW KaswidjantiH HimawanP SilitongaH SharmaA TandonP KapurA AggarwalX LiuY WangJ HuX ZhangY YangY LiuX ChenSPV ReshmaA JohnR SandaZ BaizalF NhitaI PerikosI HatzilygeroudisX WenJ ChenL ZhaoJ GawadeL ParthibanO AbdelwahabM BahgatC LowranceA ElmaghrabyJ GawadeL ParthibanF NoorM BakhtyarJ Baber
This study aims to compare the accuracy of the sentiment analysis of TikTok application users using the Naïve Bayes algorithm and the Support Vector Machine. The data set in this study comes from comments from Tiktok users on Twitter social media. Comparison of the accuracy of sentiment analysis in this study was carried out through three tests. The first test was conducted on 848 tweets, the second test used 957 tweet data, and the third test used 1,925 tweet data. Testing is done by dividing the data by 70% for training data and 30% for test data. The results showed that the accuracy of the Naive algorithm was 89.35% and 94.08% using the Support Vector Machine algorithm.
Styawati StyawatiAuliya Rahman IsnainNirwana HendrastutyLili Andraini
Rizki RahmatullahJundi Nourfateha ElquthbFanya Nindha Al-QuraniAnnisa Uswatun Khasanah
Sulton Nur HakimAndika Julianto PutraAnnisa Uswatun Khasanah
Murman Dwi PrasetioRais Yufli XavierHaris RachmatWiyono WiyonoDenny Sukma Eka Atmaja