K. SunithaKrishna Alabujanahalli NeelegowdaB. Guru PrasadI AmeriniL BallanR CaldelliA BimboL TongoG SerraS RyuM LeeH LeeZ HeW LuW SunJ HuangP ManB LiuXC YuanL XiangJ LiS WangA LiewF ChengX HuangJ FuJ LiuH TianZ FangH LuQ WangR ZhangX BiC PunX YuanJ ZhongY GanJ YoungL HuangP LinT MahmoodA IrtazaZ MehmoodM MahmoodJ FridrichD SoukalJ LukasJ DengJ YangS WengG GuZ LiD CozzolinoG PoggiL VerdolivaH HuangA CiouK MeenaaV TyagiG JinX WanM JaberiG BebisM HussainG MuhammadB ShivakumarS BabooI AmeriniL BallanR CaldelliA BimboG SerraH BayT TuytelaarsL VangoolD UliyanH JalabA WahabS SadeghiF YangJ LiW LuJ WengK SunithaA KrishnaK SunithaA KrishnaB PrasadY ChaitraR DineshM GopalakrishnaB PrakashY WuA WayM ReyB AhmedT GulliverS ZahirY ZhangJ GohL WinV ThingZ ZhangY ZhangZ ZhouJ LuoJ OuyangY LiuM LiaoB XiaoY WeiX BiW LiJ MaR ZhangJ NiX WangH WangS NiuJ ZhangJ WangQ NiG LiuX LuoS JhaJ HaoZ ZhangS YangD XieS PuF BiachI IalaH LaanayaK MinaouiH DingL ChenQ TaoZ FuL DongX CuiY RaoJ NiH XieJ DongW WangT TanH FengC FuT BianchiA Piva
The fake images and visuals can easily spread among social media users and they largely impact decisionmaking in society.Image forgery has become increasingly common as more non-professionals have access to image manipulation tools.These fake images are so sneaky that an ordinary person cannot guess them.Through social media, such photos are utilized to promote erroneous information in society.Image forgery detection is about segmenting the forged part from the images, primarily a region of interest.This paper suggests a unique method that depends on a dual attention network to detect forged segments.This network contains self-attention modules that contribute to extracting and matching features in the channel and spatial domains.These features help locate and identify the forged portions of digital images at various scales and channels.This experimental study uses typical datasets such as CASIA V1.0, CASIA V2.0, and Columbia.Proposed IFLNet technique outperforms other advanced techniques with a precision of 96 %, recall rate of 95 %, accuracy rate of 98 %, F1-score of 96 % and IoU score of 92 % for Columbia dataset and correspondingly other two datasets also.
Wenhui GongYan ChenMohammad S. AlamJun Sang
Caiping YanRenhai LiuHong LiJinghui WuHaojie Pan
Yanzhi XuMuhammad IrfanAiqing FangJiangbin Zheng
Zhuo LongShunquan TanBin LiJiwu Huang