JOURNAL ARTICLE

Analyzing Interdisciplinary Research Using Co‐Authorship Networks

Abstract

With the advancement of scientific collaboration in the 20 th century, researchers started collaborating in many research areas. Researchers and scientists no longer remain solitary individuals; instead, they collaborate to advance fundamental understandings of research topics. Various bibliometric methods are used to quantify the scientific collaboration among researchers and scientific communities. Among these different bibliometric methods, the co‐authorship method is one of the most verifiable methods to quantify or analyze scientific collaboration. In this research, the initial study has been conducted to analyze interdisciplinary research (IDR) activities in the computer science domain. The ACM has classified the computer science fields. We selected the Journal of Universal Computer Science (J.UCS) for experimentation purposes. The J.UCS is the first Journal of Computer Science that addresses a complete ACM topic. Using J.UCS data, the co‐authorship network of the researcher up to the 2 nd level was developed. Then the co‐authorship network was analyzed to find interdisciplinary among scientific communities. Additionally, the results are also visualized to comprehend the interdisciplinary among the ACM categories. A whole working web‐based system has been developed, and a forced directed graph technique has been implemented to understand IDR trends in ACM categories. Finally, the IDR values between the categories are computed to quantify the collaboration trends among the ACM categories. It was found that “Artificial Intelligence” and “Information Storage and Retrieval”, “Natural Language Processing and Information Storage and Retrieval”, and “Human‐Computer Interface” and “Database Applications” were found the most overlapping areas by acquiring an IDR score of 0.879, 0.711, and 0.663, respectively.

Keywords:
Computer science Data science Information retrieval

Metrics

55
Cited By
11.96
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
32
Refs
0.99
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Social Sciences →  Decision Sciences →  Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Research Data Management Practices
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Information Systems
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Social Sciences →  Decision Sciences →  Information Systems and Management
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.