JOURNAL ARTICLE

Importance Sampling for Bootstrap Confidence Intervals

M. V. Johns

Year: 1988 Journal:   Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol: 83 (403)Pages: 709-709

Abstract

Abstract The use of importance-sampling methods to substantially reduce the amount of resampling necessary for the construction of nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals is investigated. The classical importance-sampling method of Hammersley and Handscomb (1964) is modified to apply to the estimation of quantiles. Based on this method, a resampling procedure is introduced that recenters the bootstrap distribution of a robust estimator of location to produce estimated confidence limits that are much more accurate (for a given amount of resampling) than those obtained by the usual bootstrap method (Efron 1982). The required recentering is accomplished with a suitable "exponential tilting" similar to that used in another connection by Field and Hampel (1982). This importance-sampling procedure is used to produce bootstrap confidence intervals for location based on a class of estimators that includes symmetric M estimators. These interval estimates are asymptotically optimal in a certain sense. Simulation results for 95% confidence intervals based on a particular robust one-step (from the median) M estimator and its studentized version are presented for sample size 20 for the normal and the normal/uniform (slash) distributions. Studentization is accomplished by dividing the location estimator by the sample analog of its asymptotic standard deviation. The importance-sampling results obtained for bootstrap replication sizes 10, 20, and 40 are compared with the standard bootstrap confidence-interval method based on 400 replications. The simulation size for each case is 10,000. These results suggest that the bootstrap replication size may be reduced by as much as a factor of 10 or more when importance sampling is used. The proposed confidence-interval procedures provide alternatives to those given by Gross (1976), Davison and Hinkley (1986), and DiCiccio and Tibshirani (1987). It seems likely that the general approach proposed in this article could be useful in a variety of other confidence-interval estimation problems.

Keywords:
Confidence interval Statistics Robust confidence intervals Mathematics Sampling (signal processing) CDF-based nonparametric confidence interval Econometrics Computer science

Metrics

28
Cited By
0.88
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.77
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Statistical Methods and Inference
Physical Sciences →  Mathematics →  Statistics and Probability
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Social Sciences →  Decision Sciences →  Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Data Quality and Management
Social Sciences →  Decision Sciences →  Management Science and Operations Research

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Importance Sampling for Bootstrap Confidence Intervals

M. V. Johns

Journal:   Journal of the American Statistical Association Year: 1988 Vol: 83 (403)Pages: 709-714
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Adaptive Cluster Sampling

Mary C. ChristmanJeffrey S. Pontius

Journal:   Biometrics Year: 2000 Vol: 56 (2)Pages: 503-510
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Normal and Bootstrap Confidence Intervals in Bitterlich Sampling

Georgios StamatellosAristeidis Georgakis

Journal:   Open Journal of Forestry Year: 2019 Vol: 10 (01)Pages: 58-65
JOURNAL ARTICLE

BETTER CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR IMPORTANCE SAMPLING

Halis SakWolfgang HörmannJosef Leydold

Journal:   International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance Year: 2010 Vol: 13 (08)Pages: 1279-1291
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Better confidence intervals for importance sampling

Halis SakJosef Leydold

Journal:   Winter Simulation Conference Year: 2008 Pages: 2949-2949
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.