BOOK-CHAPTER

Double Jeopardy

Kenneth Hamer

Year: 2019 Oxford University Press eBooks   Publisher: Oxford University Press

Abstract

The claimant, a police officer, claimed that the double jeopardy rule and/or the doctrine of res judicata precluded the bringing or continuation of disciplinary proceedings in such circumstances. On 14 December 1998, the claimant was charged with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. At a committal hearing on 17 May 1999, the district judge at Bow Street Magistrates’ Court declined to commit the claimant (and his co-accused) for trial and accordingly discharged them. On 8 June 1999, Eady J refused the Crown’s application for a voluntary bill of indictment on the same charge. The claimant was subsequently charged with an offence of discreditable conduct pursuant to the Police (Discipline) Regulations 1985.

Keywords:
Plaintiff Indictment Law Double jeopardy Political science Res judicata Officer Commit Economic Justice

Metrics

0
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.54
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Topics

European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Political Science and International Relations
Criminal Law and Evidence
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Law

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Jeopardy in Double Jeopardy

Joel RubinsonJoel Rubinson

Journal:   Journal of Advertising Research Year: 1997 Vol: 37 (6)Pages: 37-49
BOOK-CHAPTER

Double Jeopardy

Shane GrimsleyAleksandar Mijović

Transfusion Medicine Year: 2023 Pages: 133-138
BOOK-CHAPTER

Double Jeopardy

Year: 1999
BOOK-CHAPTER

Double Jeopardy

II. Jeopardy at Pretrial Proceedings

Year: 1999 Pages: 177-190
BOOK-CHAPTER

Double Jeopardy

Myrna Goldenberg

Year: 2015
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.