Abstract

Earlier studies have established that the (perceived) similarity of users is highly subjective and reflects more on how people respect/admire others rather than their characteristics or behavioral similarities. We study this phenomenon among Twitter users, and while confirm that it is indeed the case, we further explore the components of similarity by investigating it using data from three categories (interactions between egos and alters, profile-based activity history, and linguistic content in the messages). We use interactions as estimation for admiration and observe that it has more impact and a higher correlation to the perceived similarity than other objective measures, including similarity based on user profiles and their use of hashtags.

Keywords:
Admiration Similarity (geometry) Computer science Phenomenon Information retrieval Psychology World Wide Web Social psychology Artificial intelligence

Metrics

4
Cited By
0.14
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
49
Refs
0.49
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Physical Sciences →  Physics and Astronomy →  Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Physics and Astronomy →  Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Sociology and Political Science

Related Documents

BOOK-CHAPTER

Content-Based Similarity of Twitter Users

Stefano MizzaroMarco PavanIvan Scagnetto

Lecture notes in computer science Year: 2015 Pages: 507-512
BOOK-CHAPTER

A Contextual Framework to Find Similarity Between Users on Twitter

Sonika DahiyaGaurav KumarArnav Yadav

Advances in intelligent systems and computing Year: 2021 Pages: 793-805
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Analysis of self-injury tweets among Korean Twitter users (Preprint)

Sang Yup LeeInAe Kim

Journal:   JMIR Mental Health Year: 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Self-Disclosure and Boundary Impermeability among Languages of Twitter Users

Phil-Sik Jang

Journal:   The Journal of the Korea Contents Association Year: 2016 Vol: 16 (4)Pages: 434-441
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.