JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sparse channel sampling for ultrasound localization microscopy (SPARSE-ULM)

Erwan HardyJonathan PoréeHatim BelgharbiChloé BourquinFrédéric LesageJean Provost

Year: 2021 Journal:   Physics in Medicine and Biology Vol: 66 (9)Pages: 095008-095008   Publisher: IOP Publishing

Abstract

Abstract Ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) has recently enabled the mapping of the cerebral vasculature in vivo with a resolution ten times smaller than the wavelength used, down to ten microns. However, with frame rates up to 20000 frames per second, this method requires large amount of data to be acquired, transmitted, stored, and processed. The transfer rate is, as of today, one of the main limiting factors of this technology. Herein, we introduce a novel reconstruction framework to decrease this quantity of data to be acquired and the complexity of the required hardware by randomly subsampling the channels of a linear probe. Method performance evaluation as well as parameters optimization were conducted in silico using the SIMUS simulation software in an anatomically realistic phantom and then compared to in vivo acquisitions in a rat brain after craniotomy. Results show that reducing the number of active elements deteriorates the signal-to-noise ratio and could lead to false microbubbles detections but has limited effect on localization accuracy. In simulation, the false positive rate on microbubble detection deteriorates from 3.7% for 128 channels in receive and 7 steered angles to 11% for 16 channels and 7 angles. The average localization accuracy ranges from 10.6 μ m and 9.93 μ m for 16 channels/3 angles and 128 channels/13 angles respectively. These results suggest that a compromise can be found between the number of channels and the quality of the reconstructed vascular network and demonstrate feasibility of performing ULM with a reduced number of channels in receive, paving the way for low-cost devices enabling high-resolution vascular mapping.

Keywords:
Imaging phantom Computer science Channel (broadcasting) Artificial intelligence Frame rate Software Microbubbles Computer vision Biomedical engineering Ultrasound Algorithm Physics Optics Acoustics Medicine Telecommunications

Metrics

9
Cited By
0.83
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
64
Refs
0.66
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Physical Sciences →  Engineering →  Biomedical Engineering
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Health Sciences →  Medicine →  Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Health Sciences →  Medicine →  Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.