JOURNAL ARTICLE

Do Musicians and Non-musicians Differ in Speech-on-Speech Processing?

Elif Canseza KaplanAnita WagnerPaolo ToffaninDeniz Başkent

Year: 2021 Journal:   Frontiers in Psychology Vol: 12 Pages: 623787-623787   Publisher: Frontiers Media

Abstract

Earlier studies have shown that musically trained individuals may have a benefit in adverse listening situations when compared to non-musicians, especially in speech-on-speech perception. However, the literature provides mostly conflicting results. In the current study, by employing different measures of spoken language processing, we aimed to test whether we could capture potential differences between musicians and non-musicians in speech-on-speech processing. We used an offline measure of speech perception (sentence recall task), which reveals a post-task response, and online measures of real time spoken language processing: gaze-tracking and pupillometry. We used stimuli of comparable complexity across both paradigms and tested the same groups of participants. In the sentence recall task, musicians recalled more words correctly than non-musicians. In the eye-tracking experiment, both groups showed reduced fixations to the target and competitor words’ images as the level of speech maskers increased. The time course of gaze fixations to the competitor did not differ between groups in the speech-in-quiet condition, while the time course dynamics did differ between groups as the two-talker masker was added to the target signal. As the level of two-talker masker increased, musicians showed reduced lexical competition as indicated by the gaze fixations to the competitor. The pupil dilation data showed differences mainly in one target-to-masker ratio. This does not allow to draw conclusions regarding potential differences in the use of cognitive resources between groups. Overall, the eye-tracking measure enabled us to observe that musicians may be using a different strategy than non-musicians to attain spoken word recognition as the noise level increased. However, further investigation with more fine-grained alignment between the processes captured by online and offline measures is necessary to establish whether musicians differ due to better cognitive control or sound processing.

Keywords:
Pupillary response Psychology Pupillometry Active listening Speech perception Gaze Perception Sentence Recall Eye tracking Cognitive psychology Cognition Task (project management) QUIET Speech recognition Audiology Communication Computer science Natural language processing Artificial intelligence Pupil

Metrics

17
Cited By
1.34
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
77
Refs
0.75
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Life Sciences →  Neuroscience →  Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Life Sciences →  Neuroscience →  Cognitive Neuroscience
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Social Sciences →  Psychology →  Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Differences in speech-on-speech processing between musicians and non-musicians: The role of durational cues

Elif Canseza KaplanDeniz BaşkentAnita Wagner

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 2020 Vol: 148 (4_Supplement)Pages: 2720-2720
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Differences in Processing Speech-on-Speech Between Musicians and Non-musicians: The Role of Prosodic Cues

Elif Canseza KaplanDeniz BaşkentAnita Wagner

Journal:   University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) Year: 2019 Pages: 5756-5758
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sadness is unique: neural processing of emotions in speech prosody in musicians and non-musicians

Mona ParkEvgeny GutyrchikLorenz WelkerPetra CarlErnst PöppelYuliya ZaytsevaThomas MeindlJanusch BlautzikMaximilian ReiserYan Bao

Journal:   Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) Year: 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech

Dana BoebingerSamuel EvansStuart RosenCésar F. LimaTom ManlySophie K. Scott

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 2015 Vol: 137 (1)Pages: 378-387
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.