JOURNAL ARTICLE

Neural Abstractive Text Summarization with Sequence-to-Sequence Models

Tian ShiYaser KeneshlooNaren RamakrishnanChandan K. Reddy

Year: 2021 Journal:   ACM/IMS Transactions on Data Science Vol: 2 (1)Pages: 1-37   Publisher: Association for Computing Machinery

Abstract

In the past few years, neural abstractive text summarization with sequence-to-sequence (seq2seq) models have gained a lot of popularity. Many interesting techniques have been proposed to improve seq2seq models, making them capable of handling different challenges, such as saliency, fluency and human readability, and generate high-quality summaries. Generally speaking, most of these techniques differ in one of these three categories: network structure, parameter inference, and decoding/generation. There are also other concerns, such as efficiency and parallelism for training a model. In this article, we provide a comprehensive literature survey on different seq2seq models for abstractive text summarization from the viewpoint of network structures, training strategies, and summary generation algorithms. Several models were first proposed for language modeling and generation tasks, such as machine translation, and later applied to abstractive text summarization. Hence, we also provide a brief review of these models. As part of this survey, we also develop an open source library, namely, Neural Abstractive Text Summarizer (NATS) toolkit, for the abstractive text summarization. An extensive set of experiments have been conducted on the widely used CNN/Daily Mail dataset to examine the effectiveness of several different neural network components. Finally, we benchmark two models implemented in NATS on the two recently released datasets, namely, Newsroom and Bytecup.

Keywords:
Automatic summarization Computer science Artificial intelligence Natural language processing Artificial neural network Fluency Sequence (biology) Machine translation Benchmark (surveying) Set (abstract data type) Multi-document summarization Linguistics Programming language

Metrics

191
Cited By
21.73
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
66
Refs
1.00
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Topic Modeling
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.