JOURNAL ARTICLE

Spatial Frequency Filtering: Choices Matter

Dirk WaltherSabrina PerfettoJohn Wilder

Year: 2020 Journal:   Journal of Vision Vol: 20 (11)Pages: 1205-1205   Publisher: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

Abstract

Spatial frequency content is an important property of natural scenes and has been studied at length. To isolate the effects of specific spatial frequencies, images are typically filtered to include only a particular range of frequencies. The filtered images are then used in experimental tasks assessing observers’ performance in scene content-related task. In addition to selecting the filtering frequency, several other choices that are made in the process of generating filtered images are likely to affect visual perception. We investigated three such choices: the shape of the frequency filter, contrast normalization, and contrast polarity of high spatial frequency-filtered images. We generated filtered images with different settings of these parameters and used them as stimuli in a speeded six-alternative forced-choice scene categorization task. We found that each of the choices strongly affected the categorization performance for low and high pass-filtered images, sometimes determining which of the two resulted in better performance. Filter shape needs to balance a clean frequency cut-off with minimizing ringing artifacts in the filtered image. We recommend using a second-order Butterworth filter as a reasonable compromise. Because of the power spectrum of natural images, filtering images without normalizing contrast severely hurts high pass-filtered images, making them hard to recognize simply due to a lack of contrast. We therefore recommend adjusting contrast energy to be the same for low and high-pass filtered images. High pass-filtered images can be depicted as white lines or black lines on a neutral background without affecting their spatial frequency content. We find that black lines are easier to recognize, presumably due to the cultural habit of drawing by making dark markings on a bright medium. To summarize, we find that several choices in the process of generating frequency-filtered images matter for visual perception. We have quantified these effects empirically and derived specific recommendations.

Keywords:
Spatial frequency Contrast (vision) Artificial intelligence Computer vision Ringing artifacts Computer science Filter (signal processing) Categorization Spatial filter Normalization (sociology) High-pass filter Pattern recognition (psychology) Ringing Mathematics Low-pass filter Image (mathematics) Optics Physics

Metrics

1
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.13
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Speech and Audio Processing
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Signal Processing
Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Physical Sciences →  Engineering →  Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Related Documents

BOOK-CHAPTER

Spatial frequency filtering

Ajoy GhatakK. Thyagarajan

Cambridge University Press eBooks Year: 1989 Pages: 167-180
BOOK-CHAPTER

Why Localized Spatial Frequency Filtering?

Russell L. De ValoisKaren K. De Valois

Spatial Vision Year: 1991 Pages: 333-349
BOOK-CHAPTER

Spatial Frequency Filtering and Holography

K. ThyagarajanAjoy Ghatak

Graduate texts in physics Year: 2010 Pages: 389-402
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.