JOURNAL ARTICLE

Deep Critiquing for VAE-based Recommender Systems

Abstract

Providing explanations for recommended items not only allows users to understand the reason for receiving recommendations but also provides users with an opportunity to refine recommendations by critiquing undesired parts of the explanation. While much research focuses on improving the explanation of recommendations, less effort has focused on interactive recommendation by allowing a user to critique explanations. Aside from traditional constraint- and utility-based critiquing systems, the only end-to-end deep learning based critiquing approach in the literature so far, CE-VNCF, suffers from unstable and inefficient training performance. In this paper, we propose a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) based critiquing system to mitigate these issues and improve overall performance. The proposed model generates keyphrase-based explanations of recommendations and allows users to critique the generated explanations to refine their personalized recommendations. Our experiments show promising results: (1) The proposed model is competitive in terms of general performance in comparison to state-of-the-art recommenders, despite having an augmented loss function to support explanation and critiquing. (2) The proposed model can generate high-quality explanations compared to user or item keyphrase popularity baselines. (3) The proposed model is more effective in refining recommendations based on critiquing than CE-VNCF, where the rank of critiquing-affected items drops while general recommendation performance remains stable. In summary, this paper presents a significantly improved method for multi-step deep critiquing based recommender systems based on the VAE framework.

Keywords:
Computer science Recommender system Popularity Autoencoder Constraint (computer-aided design) Artificial intelligence Deep learning Aside Rank (graph theory) Quality (philosophy) Function (biology) Information retrieval Machine learning Data science

Metrics

40
Cited By
7.93
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
23
Refs
0.97
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Recommender Systems and Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Information Systems
Topic Modeling
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Artificial Intelligence

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Hybrid critiquing-based recommender systems

Li ChenPearl Pu

Year: 2007 Pages: 22-31
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Interaction design guidelines on critiquing-based recommender systems

Li ChenPearl Pu

Journal:   User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Year: 2008 Vol: 19 (3)Pages: 167-206
DISSERTATION

Automatic Knowledge Acquisition for Critiquing-Based Recommender Systems

Ziaei, Hesam

University:   UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) Year: 2019
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.