JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of adaptive and compressed sensing beamformers

Paul Hursky

Year: 2018 Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol: 144 (3_Supplement)Pages: 1943-1943   Publisher: Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

We will review the capabilities and requirements of the Minimum Variance Distortionless Response (MVDR) and sparsity-seeking beamformers, from a system design perspective. We will focus on the problem of detecting a quiet source in the presence of loud interferers. These methods are solutions to particular and different optimization problems, requiring particular combinations of inputs. Thus, for example, MVDR does not require us to model the interference, whereas the sparsity-seeking methods need both interferer and quiet source models to be put into their dictionary. MVDR is notorious for requiring more precise calibration than is needed for conventional beamformers. We will present demonstrations on simulated and experiment data, illustrating key differences between the two methods.

Keywords:
QUIET Computer science Focus (optics) Perspective (graphical) Compressed sensing Variance (accounting) Minimum-variance unbiased estimator Key (lock) Interference (communication) Calibration Algorithm Artificial intelligence Mathematics Telecommunications Statistics Mean squared error Physics

Metrics

0
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.11
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Topics

Speech and Audio Processing
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Signal Processing
Advanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Engineering →  Computational Mechanics
Blind Source Separation Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Signal Processing

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Near-Optimal Adaptive Compressed Sensing

Matthew MalloyRobert D. Nowak

Journal:   IEEE Transactions on Information Theory Year: 2014 Vol: 60 (7)Pages: 4001-4012
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.