Vladimir PaunovićGuido ZichittellaSharon MitchellRoland HauertJavier Pérez‐Ramírez
This article studies the impact of the carrier type (MgO, SiO2, SiC, Al2O3, and ZrO2) and synthesis method (dry impregnation, coprecipitation, hydrothermal synthesis, and mechanochemical synthesis) on the structure, redox properties, and performance of supported CeO2 catalysts for methane oxybromination. Major distinctions are evidenced in the product distribution with respect to bulk CeO2, and the selectivity to methyl bromide (CH3Br) varies in the following order: CeO2/MgO (61–81%) > CeO2/SiC (56–73%) ≈ CeO2/SiO2 (52–71%) > bulk CeO2 (40%) ≈ CeO2/ZrO2 > CeO2/Al2O3 (28–35%) at 6–40% methane conversion. The selectivity is primarily governed by the catalyst propensity to combust CH3Br and byproduct dibromomethane (CH2Br2), which is strongly affected by the choice of the carrier. Specifically, the formation of carbon oxides is substantially suppressed over CeO2 nanoparticles stabilized on basic MgO (COx selectivity <10%) with respect to bulk CeO2 (COx selectivity ≥50%), whereas it is promoted by near atomic dispersions of CeO2 on acidic ZrO2 and Al2O3 carriers. Changes in the size and shape of CeO2 nanoparticles on MgO had little impact on the selectivity, as they exhibit similar oxidation properties after exposure to the reaction environment. The synthesis–structure–performance relationships developed demonstrate the great potential of supporting CeO2 to enhance the oxybromination performance.
Vladimir Paunović (3722704)Guido Zichittella (3722707)Sharon Mitchell (217511)Roland Hauert (1537294)Javier Pérez-Ramírez (1512790)
Vladimir PaunovićM. ArtusiRené VerelFrank KrumeichRoland HauertJavier Pérez‐Ramírez
Peng WangLang ChenSheng ShenChak‐Tong AuShuang‐Feng Yin
Liangguang TangDoki YamaguchiNick BurkeD.L. TrimmKen Chiang
Astrid WolfbeisserOnsulang SophiphunJohannes BernardiJatuporn WittayakunKarin FöttingerGünther Rupprechter