Scaffolding Collaborative Design Online

Abstract

Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract References 1. Jonassen, D.H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 48 (4), 63-85. 2. Meacham, J.A., Emont, N.C. (1989). The interpersonal basis of everyday problem solving. In J.D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications (pp. 7-23). New York: Praeger. 3. Mostow, J. (1985). Toward better models of the design process. AI Magazine, 6, 44-57 4. Dym, C.L., & Little, P. (2004). Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction 5. Darses, F. The constraint satisfaction approach to design: A psychological investigation. Acta Psychologica, 78, 307-325 (1991). 6. Chi, M.T.H., Slotta, J.D., & de Leeuw, N/A. From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4: 27-43 (1994). 7. Cho, K.L., & Jonassen, D.H. (2002). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 50 (3)5-22.