BOOK-CHAPTER

10 Is Kenotic Christology Orthodox?

Abstract

Abstract There are two main theories to explain how incarnation was possible: classical christology and kenotic christology. This chapter defends one version of kenoticism. The biblical issue is: which theory best captures the Jesus that we find described in the Gospels? The philosophical issue is: in order to be “truly human”, must the Logos limit itself or divest itself of certain divine properties? Kenoticism is orthodox because it is consistent with Scripture (as seen in Philippians 2:1-11) and with classical creeds. Three objections to kenoticism are answered.

Keywords:
Christology Philosophy Religious studies Theology

Metrics

0
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
92
Refs
0.18
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Topics

Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Social Sciences →  Arts and Humanities →  Philosophy
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Social Sciences →  Arts and Humanities →  Philosophy
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Social Sciences →  Arts and Humanities →  Religious studies

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Kenotic Christology

Malcolm TorryE. L. MascallJohn-Francis Phipps

Journal:   Theology Year: 1983 Vol: 86 (711)Pages: 204-208
BOOK

Kierkegaard's Kenotic Christology

David R. Law

Oxford University Press eBooks Year: 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Fichte’s Kenotic Christology

C. Jeffery Kinlaw

Journal:   Idealistic Studies Year: 1992 Vol: 22 (1)Pages: 39-51
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Book Reviews : Kenotic Christology

George Newlands

Journal:   The Expository Times Year: 1982 Vol: 94 (3)Pages: 90-90
BOOK-CHAPTER

The Nature of Kenotic Christology

David R. Law

Oxford University Press eBooks Year: 2013 Pages: 34-63
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.