DISSERTATION

Representational redescription and the development of cognitive flexibility

Mary Fiona Spensley

Year: 1995 University:   Europe PMC (PubMed Central)   Publisher: European Bioinformatics Institute

Abstract

Karmiloff-Smith (e.g. 1986, 1992) has suggested that 'cognitive flexibility' is the result of a series of three representational redescriptions. These redescriptions are carried out by endogenous metaprocesses operating directly on the representations. Representational redescription accounts only for development beyond 'behavioural success', the stimulus to the redescription being stability at a previous level.

Many features of the Representational Redescription theory are criticised, but the underlying idea that cognitive flexibility is associated with representational level is maintained. This point is supported by a review and study of planning development arguing that representational development, rather than process development explains increasing flexibility.

Data from children's drawings and block balancing, along with a theoretical analysis of the model indicate that the details of the Representational Redescription theory are not consistent or plausible. In particular the concepts of initial procedural representation, endogenous metaprocesses, behavioural success, stability as the spur to development, and implicit information within representations, are rejected.

Removing the constraints of behavioural success suggests a new recursive model, which is proposed as a general developmental mechanism. 'Recursive Re-Representation' views representational redescription as a creative process, and builds on Boden's (1992) computational approach to creativity. Cognitive flexibility is determined by a limited cognitive capacity, the level of 'chunking' in a domain and the possession of an overview of the relevant conceptual space. Chunking is achieved through a re-representation of behaviour and the environment, rather than a direct operation on representations. The BAIRN system (Wallace, Klahr & Bluff, 1987) is suggested as providing the basis for an implementation of Recursive ReRepresentation.

It is argued that the Recursive Re-Representation account which views Representational Redecription as a recursive, creative process provides a more parsimonious approach to representational change throughout development.

Keywords:
Chunking (psychology) Cognitive science Representation (politics) Cognition Flexibility (engineering) Computer science Psychology Cognitive psychology Artificial intelligence Mathematics

Metrics

2
Cited By
0.44
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.67
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Topics

Child and Animal Learning Development
Social Sciences →  Psychology →  Developmental and Educational Psychology
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Social Sciences →  Psychology →  Developmental and Educational Psychology
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Social Sciences →  Psychology →  Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Representational redescription and cognitive architectures

Antonella CarassaMaurizio Tirassa

Journal:   Behavioral and Brain Sciences Year: 1994 Vol: 17 (4)Pages: 711-712
BOOK-CHAPTER

Modeling Development: Representational Redescription and Connectionism

The MIT Press eBooks Year: 1992 Pages: 170-185
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Beyond representational redescription

Fiona Spensley

Journal:   Behavioral and Brain Sciences Year: 1997 Vol: 20 (2)Pages: 354-355
BOOK-CHAPTER

DISCOURSE AND REPRESENTATIONAL REDESCRIPTION

Harvard University Press eBooks Year: 2009 Pages: 161-200
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.