Polypyrrole/multi-walled carbon nanotube, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/multi-walled carbon nanotube and their nanocomposites P(EDOT-co-Py)/multi-walled carbon nanotube and P(EDOT-co-Py)/copper (II) oxide, (CuO) in the initial feed ratio of [EDOT]0/[Py]0 = 1/5 were electrosynthesized on glassy carbon electrode by cyclic voltammetric method. Their characterizations were performed by cyclic voltammetric, Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflectance, scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersion X-ray analysis, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. To the best of authors’ knowledge, the first report on polypyrrole/multi-walled carbon nanotube, PEDOT/multi-walled carbon nanotube, P(EDOT-co-Py)/multi-walled carbon nanotube and P(EDOT-co-Py)/CuO nanocomposite films were comparatively examined in 0.1 M NaClO4/CH3CN and in 0.1 M sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions. The highest specific capacitance for PEDOT/multi-walled carbon nanotube and polypyrrole/multi-walled carbon nanotube composite films were obtained as Csp = 306 mF × cm−2 for 3% multi-walled carbon nanotube and Csp = 804 mF × cm−2 for 1% multi-walled carbon nanotube, respectively. The highest specific capacitances were obtained as Csp = 27.40 mF × cm−2 and Csp = 26.90 mF × cm−2 for P(EDOT-co-Py)/multi-walled carbon nanotube includes the wt percent of 1% multi-walled carbon nanotube and P(EDOT-co-Py)/CuO includes the wt percent of 3% CuO, respectively. The Csp of P(EDOT-co-Py)/CNT composite films were calculated as 9.43 and 11.49 mF × cm−2 for 3 and 5% multi-walled carbon nanotube, respectively. In addition, The EIS results were simulated with the equivalent circuit model of Rs(Cdl1(R1(QR2)))(Cdl2R3).
Bakhshali MassoumiNastaran AlipourSoghra FathalipourMehdi Jaymand
Alexander KrosNico A. J. M. SommerdijkRoeland J. M. Nolte
Stephen A. FosseyFerdinando F. BrunoJayant KumarLynne A. Samuelson
Özlem TürkarslanSenem Kıralp KayahanLevent Toppare
Shawn A. SappSilvia LuebbenYa. B. LosovyjP. JeppsonDouglas L. SchulzAnthony N. Caruso