JOURNAL ARTICLE

URGENSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PILKADA OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Ida Puspa Jaya Miha

Year: 2015 Journal:   Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol: 4 (3)   Publisher: Udayana University

Abstract

The rise of the disputed local elections assessed due to poor direct voting system that alwaysend with anarchic conflict. Direct voting system is briefly diverted to be chosen by the Houseof Representatives (DPR) through Law 22 of 2014 concerning Election of Governors,Regents and Mayors but this law received widespread rejection by the people so that thePresident issued Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2014 which regulates thesame things that later passed into Law No. 1 of 2015. Article 157 paragraph (1) of Law No.8 of 2015 on the Amendment of Act No. 1 of 2015 mandates the establishment of a specialtribunal to deal with the settlement of disputes nationwide simultaneous election to be heldin 2027. If the judiciary is not yet formed, the implementation of election dispute resolutionmade by the Constitutional Court (MK). Based on the description above background, asfor the formulation of the problem to be studied is; What advantages and disadvantages ofthe establishment of a special judicial body which handles dispute resolution election? Andwhat is the urgency of the election dispute resolution by the Constitutional Court? This typeof research is a kind of normative legal research descriptive analysis using the approach oflegislation, the legal concept analysis approach, historical approach, and the approach ofcase law derived from the source material of primary, secondary and tertiary using a cardsystem as its legal material collection technique.The conclusion of this study is the establishment of a special judicial body has advantagesand disadvantages. The drawback is; unconstitutional existence of the judicial authoritiesfor not guided by Article 24 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 27 paragraph(1) of Act 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power, the magnitude of the amount of the budget that willbe issued by the state to establish such institutions. The advantage is ease the burden on theMK, more focused and rapid election dispute resolution process.

Keywords:
Law Political science Constitutional court Paragraph Voting Dispute resolution Government (linguistics) Election law Normative Settlement (finance) Constitution Business Politics

Metrics

1
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
2
Refs
0.22
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Political Science and International Relations
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Political Science and International Relations
Legal Studies and Policies
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Law

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pilkada Langsung

Alfret Ananias BaniNurianto Rahmat SoepadmoIda Bagus Anggapurana Pidada

Journal:   Politika Progresif Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Humaniora Year: 2024 Vol: 1 (3)Pages: 232-245
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Problematika Penyelesaian Sengketa Hasil Pemilukada oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi

Hamdan Zoelva

Journal:   Jurnal Konstitusi Year: 2016 Vol: 10 (3)
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi

Luthfi Widagdo Eddyono

Journal:   Jurnal Konstitusi Year: 2016 Vol: 7 (3)Pages: 001-001
JOURNAL ARTICLE

PROBLEMATIKA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEWENANGAN LEMBAGA NEGARA OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Janpatar Simamora

Journal:   Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Year: 2016 Vol: 28 (1)Pages: 77-77
JOURNAL ARTICLE

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEWENANGAN ANTAR LEMBAGA NEGARA OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Sulistyani Eka Lestari

Journal:   DiH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Year: 2014 Vol: 10 (19)
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.