JOURNAL ARTICLE

Improving false discovery rate estimation

Stanley PoundsCheng Cheng

Year: 2004 Journal:   Bioinformatics Vol: 20 (11)Pages: 1737-1745   Publisher: Oxford University Press

Abstract

Abstract Motivation: Recent attempts to account for multiple testing in the analysis of microarray data have focused on controlling the false discovery rate (FDR). However, rigorous control of the FDR at a preselected level is often impractical. Consequently, it has been suggested to use the q-value as an estimate of the proportion of false discoveries among a set of significant findings. However, such an interpretation of the q-value may be unwarranted considering that the q-value is based on an unstable estimator of the positive FDR (pFDR). Another method proposes estimating the FDR by modeling p-values as arising from a beta-uniform mixture (BUM) distribution. Unfortunately, the BUM approach is reliable only in settings where the assumed model accurately represents the actual distribution of p-values. Methods: A method called the spacings LOESS histogram (SPLOSH) is proposed for estimating the conditional FDR (cFDR), the expected proportion of false positives conditioned on having k ‘significant’ findings. SPLOSH is designed to be more stable than the q-value and applicable in a wider variety of settings than BUM. Results: In a simulation study and data analysis example, SPLOSH exhibits the desired characteristics relative to the q-value and BUM. Availability: The Web site www.stjuderesearch.org/statistics/splosh.html has links to freely available S-plus code to implement the proposed procedure.

Keywords:
False discovery rate False positive paradox Estimator Statistics Histogram Value (mathematics) Computer science True positive rate Set (abstract data type) Multiple comparisons problem False positives and false negatives Algorithm Mathematics Data mining Artificial intelligence Biology

Metrics

155
Cited By
17.21
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
24
Refs
0.99
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Physical Sciences →  Mathematics →  Statistics and Probability
Gene expression and cancer classification
Life Sciences →  Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology →  Molecular Biology
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Social Sciences →  Decision Sciences →  Management Science and Operations Research

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

False discovery rate estimation for metabolomics

Journal:   Nature Methods Year: 2018 Vol: 15 (1)Pages: 15-15
JOURNAL ARTICLE

False Discovery Rate Estimation in Proteomics

Suruchi AggarwalAmit Kumar Yadav

Journal:   Methods in molecular biology Year: 2015 Vol: 1362 Pages: 119-128
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Robust estimation of the false discovery rate

Stanley PoundsCheng Cheng

Journal:   Bioinformatics Year: 2006 Vol: 22 (16)Pages: 1979-1987
JOURNAL ARTICLE

A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation

Korbinian Strimmer

Journal:   BMC Bioinformatics Year: 2008 Vol: 9 (1)Pages: 303-303
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Decoy-free protein-level false discovery rate estimation

Ben TengTing HuangZengyou He

Journal:   Bioinformatics Year: 2013 Vol: 30 (5)Pages: 675-681
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.