A comparison of index flood estimation procedures for ungauged catchments

Abstract

Flood frequency analysis is used by water resources professionals to estimate the probability of exceedence associated with a flood of a given magnitude. The estimation of flood frequencies is important because they are used in the planning and design of hydraulic structures, in flood-plain management, and in reservoir operation. The index flood method is commonly used to develop a flood frequency curve that relates flood magnitude to flood rarity. This method involves scaling a dimensionless flood frequency curve by the index flood. The index flood is a middle-sized flood for which the mean or median of the flood data series is typically used. When the catchment of interest is ungauged, statistical models, such as multiple regression, are often used to relate the index flood to catchment descriptors. In this study six different parameter estimation techniques and three regionalization techniques are compared in terms of ability to predict the index flood for an ungauged catchment. A case study employing a split-sample experiment with data from catchments in Ontario, Canada, was used to evaluate the approaches. The models were assessed using three performance indices to evaluate the capability to predict the index flood for 20 stations. The dimensionless nonlinear model outperformed all of the other parameter estimation techniques for each of the three indices selected. The performance was improved through the use of geostatistical residual mapping, however, the improvement was small. The residual mapping was found to greatly improve the estimates obtained using ordinary least-squares regression.Key words: index flood, flood frequency analysis, regression, residual mapping, geostatistics.