Various evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms (EMOAs) have adopted indicator-based selection operators that augment or replace dominance ranking with quality indicators. A quality indicator measures the goodness of each solution candidate. Many quality indicators have been proposed with the intention to capture different preferences in optimization. Therefore, indicator-based selection operators tend to have biased selection pressures that evolve solution candidates toward particular regions in the objective space. An open question is whether a set of existing indicator based selection operators can create a single operator that outperforms those existing ones. To address this question, this paper studies a method to aggregate (or boost) existing indicator-based selection operators. Experimental results show that a boosted selection operator outperforms exiting ones in optimality, diversity and convergence velocity. It also exhibits robustness against different characteristics in different optimization problems and yields stable performance to solve them.
Dũng H. PhanJunichi SuzukiIsao Hayashi
Heike TrautmannTobias WagnerDirk BiermannClaus Weihs
Zhizhong LiuYong WangBing-Chuan Wang
Zhening LiuHanding WangYaochu Jin