JOURNAL ARTICLE

Alterations in gingival dimensions following rapid canine retraction using dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis

Cem A. GürganHaluk İşeri̇Reha Kişnişçi

Year: 2005 Journal:   European Journal of Orthodontics Vol: 27 (4)Pages: 324-332   Publisher: Oxford University Press

Abstract

The aim of this clinical prospective study was to evaluate the alterations that occurred in the gingival dimensions of canine teeth following dentoalveolar distraction (DAD) during a 12 month follow-up period.The study sample comprised 36 maxillary canines of 18 growing or adult subjects with a mean age of 16.94 years (13.08-25.58 years) at the start of treatment. Full retraction of the canines was achieved in 10.36 +/- 1.93 days (range 8-14 days) at a rate of 0.8 mm/day using a custom-made intraoral rigid tooth-borne distraction device. Before surgery (pre-DAD), immediately after removal of the device (post-DAD), and at 1, 6, and 12 months post-DAD, the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), pocket depth (PD) and width of keratinized gingiva were recorded and the width of attached gingiva was calculated. The alterations in clinical measurements among different evaluation periods were analysed by Friedman and repeated measure ANOVA tests. There were significant differences between pre- and post-DAD for PD measurements for all sites, with the highest at the distal site. The palatal sites likewise showed significant differences at the 1, 6, and 12 month follow-up periods compared with the post-DAD period. The buccal sites showed no significant changes at any time point. The width of keratinized gingiva also showed no significant change during the follow-up period, while the width of attached gingiva was significant only between the pre- and post-DAD periods (P < 0.01). On the basis of the above findings, it could be concluded that DAD is an innovative technique with no unfavourable long-term effects on the gingival tissues of rapidly retracted canine teeth.

Keywords:
Dentistry Medicine Orthodontics Maxillary canine Distraction osteogenesis Maxilla Periodontal probe Distraction

Metrics

23
Cited By
0.26
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
20
Refs
0.53
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

dental development and anomalies
Life Sciences →  Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology →  Molecular Biology
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Life Sciences →  Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology →  Genetics
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Life Sciences →  Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology →  Genetics

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis for rapid orthodontic canine retraction

Reha KişnişçiHaluk İşeri̇Hakan H. TüzA. Ataç

Journal:   Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Year: 2002 Vol: 60 (4)Pages: 389-394
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Transport dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis–assisted rapid orthodontic canine retraction

Viraj KharkarS.M. Kotrashetti

Journal:   Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology Year: 2010 Vol: 109 (5)Pages: 687-693
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Rapid canine retraction and orthodontic treatment with dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis

Haluk İşeri̇Reha KişnişçiNurettin BziziHakan H. Tüz

Journal:   American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Year: 2005 Vol: 127 (5)Pages: 533-541
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Rapid Canine Retraction with Dentoalveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: An in vivo Study

Allwin Benjamin RajMrityunjay KumarReena Rachel John

Journal:   The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society Year: 2013 Vol: 47 (1)Pages: 21-27
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Rapid Canine Retraction with Dentoalveolar Distraction Osteogenesis: An in vivo Study

Allwin Benjamin RajMrityunjay KumarReena Rachel John

Journal:   The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society Year: 2013 Vol: 47 Pages: 21-27
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.