Xiao‐dan ChenRong RongYun WangLi ZhuQi‐Hua ZhaoSiau Gek AngBai‐Wang Sun
Abstract Three novel copper–radical complexes [Cu(PhCOO) 2 (NITpPy) 2 (H 2 O) 2 ] ( 1 ), [Cu 2 (Me 3 CCOO) 4 (NITpPy) 2 ] ( 2 ), and [{Cu 2 (Me 3 CCOO) 4 (NITpPy)} n ] ( 3 ) [NITpPy = 4,4,5,5‐tetramethyl‐2‐(4‐pyridyl)‐2‐imidazoline‐1‐oxyl 3‐oxide] were synthesized and characterized structurally as well as magnetically. It is noteworthy that the syntheses of complexes 2 and 3 are similar except for the temperature of the reaction between Cu(Me 3 CCOO) 2 · 2H 2 O and the NITpPy radical ligand. Our magnetic study of complexes 1 and 2 reveals that the antiferromagnetic interactions occur with a J value around –10 cm –1 between copper(II) and radicals when radicals use the pyridine nitrogen atom connected to the copper(II) ion. Yet the best‐fit parameters of complex 3 reveal that significant ferromagnetic interactions ( J 2 = 20.5 cm –1 ) take place in the copper radical when radicals coordinate the copper(II) ion with nitroxide directly.
Peng HuHai‐Fu GuoYan LiFengping Xiao
Peng HuYuan‐Yuan GaoFengping XiaoLi ZhuLina WangFen SuMiao Zhang
Yali WangYuan‐Yuan GaoYue MaQing‐Lun WangLicun LiDai‐Zheng Liao
Fen SongYuan ZhangJing‐Huo ChenTian HanPeng Cheng