JOURNAL ARTICLE

Faculty Retention in Higher Education

Tariq Rahim SoomroReyaz Ahmad

Year: 2013 Journal:   International Journal of Higher Education Vol: 2 (2)   Publisher: Sciedu Press

Abstract

Criteria for retaining or firing a highly qualified faculty in higher education in many cases are vague and unclear. This situation is neither a comfortable, nor a healthy, both for the faculty and the administration. Stakeholders have enough reason to blame each other in the absence of transparent mechanism. This paper proposes a transparent point system for both faculty and higher education administration based on three most important categories – Teaching (T), Research (R), and community Service (S). This proposed transparent point system will present solution to resolve confusion among stakeholders. Faculty based on this transparent proposed point system may perform well and administration based on this proposed point system may decide to retain the faculty.

Keywords:
Psychology Medical education Mathematics education Medicine

Metrics

13
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
3
Refs
0.23
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Education
Higher Education Governance and Development
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Political Science and International Relations
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Education

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Retention of Minority Faculty in Higher Education

Dolores E. Battle

Journal:   Perspectives on Issues in Higher Education Year: 1999 Vol: 3 (2)Pages: 7-12
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Faculty retention in higher education institutions of Pakistan

Rana Zeeshan MubarakZaira WahabNaveed R. Khan

Journal:   Università degli Studi di Bologna Year: 2012
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.