JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Future Israeli‐Palestinian Relationship

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this concept paper, the Joint Working Group on Israeli‐Palestinian Relations‐a group of influential Palestinians and Israelis that has been meeting periodically since 1994 to discuss final‐status issues in the Israeli‐Palestinian negotiations‐explores the future relationship between the two societies after the signing of a peace agreement. The paper considers a relationship based on total separation between the two societies and states as neither realistic nor desirable. Instead, it envisages a future relationship based on mutually beneficial cooperation in many spheres, conducive to stable peace, sustainable development, and ultimate reconciliation. The basis for such a relationship must be laid in the process and outcome of the final‐status negotiations and in the patterns of cooperation established on the ground. Efforts at cooperation and reconciliation cannot be pursued apart from their political context. The paper argues that the only feasible political arrangement on which a cooperative relationship can be built is a two‐state solution, establishing a genuinely independent Palestinian state alongside of Israel. The resolution of final‐status issues must be consistent with the sovereignty, viability, and security of both states. The paper then proceeds to describe several models for the relationship between the two states and societies. It advocates a model of close cooperation, but proposes that this relationship be built in stages. The scope and speed of expanding and institutionalizing cooperative activities must be determined by experience‐by the extent to which such activities meet the needs of both parties, enhance mutual trust, and reduce inequalities between the parties. Finally, the paper discusses three avenues for promoting a cooperative relationship based on equality, reciprocal benefit, and mutual trust and respect: the development of functional ties and civil‐society institutions across national borders; programs directed toward attitude change and stereotype reduction; and efforts to close the economic and political gap between the two societies.

Keywords:
Negotiation Sovereignty Politics Political science Context (archaeology) Conflict resolution Scope (computer science) State (computer science) Political economy Territorial integrity Sustainable development Law and economics Sociology Law Geography Computer science

Metrics

7
Cited By
0.00
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.22
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Social Sciences →  Social Sciences →  Sociology and Political Science

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Jordanian‐Israeli Relationship: The Reality of“Cooperation”

Farooq Mitha

Journal:   Middle East Policy Year: 2010 Vol: 17 (2)Pages: 105-126
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Palestinian Refugees

Donna E. ArztDon Peretz

Journal:   Middle East Policy Year: 2000 Vol: 7 (2)Pages: 61-67
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Future of Photogrammetry

J. B. Case

Journal:   The Photogrammetric Record Year: 1992 Vol: 14 (80)Pages: 384-385
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Two Complementary Views of Peacemaking: The Palestinian‐Israeli Case

Sapir Handelman

Journal:   Middle East Policy Year: 2008 Vol: 15 (3)Pages: 56-66
JOURNAL ARTICLE

The Future of Iraq

Gary Sick

Journal:   Middle East Policy Year: 2000 Vol: 7 (4)Pages: 58-61
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.