JOURNAL ARTICLE

Analysis of approximate message passing algorithm

Abstract

Finding fast recovery algorithms is a problem of significant interest in compressed sensing. In many applications, extremely large problem sizes are envisioned, with at least tens of thousands of equations and hundreds of thousands of unknowns. The interior point methods for solving the best studied algorithm -? 1 minimization- are very slow and hence they are ineffective for such problem sizes. Faster methods such as LARS or homotopy have been proposed for solving ? 1 minimization but there is still a need for algorithms with less computational complexity. Therefore there is a fast growing literature on greedy methods and iterative thresholding for finding the sparsest solution. It was shown by that most of these algorithms perform worse than ? 1 when it comes to the sparsity-measurement tradeoff. In a recent paper the authors introduced a new algorithm called AMP which is as fast as iterative soft thresholding algorithms proposed before and performs exactly the same as ? 1 minimization. This algorithm is inspired from the message passing algorithms on bipartite graphs. The statistical properties of AMP let the authors propose a theoretical framework to analyze the asymptotic performance of the algorithm. This results in very sharp predictions of different observables in the algorithm. In this paper we address several questions regarding the thresholding policy. We consider a very general thresholding policy ?(?) for the algorithm and will use the maxmin framework to tune it optimally. It is shown that when formulated in this general form, the maxmin thresholding policy is not unique and many different thresholding policies may lead to the same phase transition. We will then propose two very simple thresholding policies that can be implemented easily in practice and prove that they are both maxmin. This analysis will also shed some light on several other aspects of the algorithm, such as the least favorable distribution and similarity of all maxmin optimal thresholding policies. We will also show how one can derive the AMP algorithm from the full message passing algorithm.

Keywords:
Algorithm Computer science Bipartite graph Thresholding Minification Greedy algorithm Compressed sensing Artificial intelligence Theoretical computer science

Metrics

39
Cited By
4.33
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
38
Refs
0.93
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Physical Sciences →  Engineering →  Computational Mechanics
Distributed Sensor Networks and Detection Algorithms
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Computer Networks and Communications
Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Physical Sciences →  Engineering →  Biomedical Engineering

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

A Matching Pursuit Generalized Approximate Message Passing Algorithm

Yongjie LuoQun WanGuan GuiFumiyuki Adachi

Journal:   IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences Year: 2015 Vol: E98.A (12)Pages: 2723-2727
JOURNAL ARTICLE

VLSI Architecture for Enhanced Approximate Message Passing Algorithm

Kota Naga Srinivasaro BattaIndrajit Chakrabarti

Journal:   IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology Year: 2019 Vol: 30 (9)Pages: 3253-3267
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.