JOURNAL ARTICLE

Intensity discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Anna C. SchroderNeal F. ViemeisterDavid A. Nelson

Year: 1994 Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol: 96 (5)Pages: 2683-2693   Publisher: Acoustical Society of America

Abstract

Weber fractions (ΔI/I) for gated 500-ms tones at 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz, and at levels of the standard ranging from absolute threshold to 97 dB SPL, were measured in quiet and in high-pass noise in five listeners with cochlear hearing loss and in three normal-hearing listeners. In regions of hearing loss, the Weber fractions at a given SPL were sometimes normal. When the Weber fractions were normal or near-normal, the addition of high-pass noise elevated the Weber fraction, strongly suggesting the use of spread of excitation to higher frequencies. Inversely, when the Weber fractions were elevated, the addition of high-pass noise produced no additional elevation, suggesting an inability to use spread of excitation. In general, the relative size of the Weber fractions, the effects of high-pass noise, and to a lesser extent, the dependence of the Weber fraction on level, were consistent with expectations based upon the audiometric configuration and the use of excitation spread. There were several notable inconsistencies, however, in which normal Weber fractions were seen at a frequency on the edge of a steep high-frequency loss, and in which elevated Weber fractions were observed in a flat audiometric configuration. Finally, when compared at the same SL, the Weber fraction was sometimes smaller in cochlear-impaired than in normal hearing listeners. This was true even in high-pass noise, where excitation spread was limited, and may reflect the unusually steep rate versus level functions seen in auditory nerve fibers that innervate regions of pathology.

Keywords:
QUIET Noise (video) Audiology Hearing loss Acoustics Physics Mathematics Medicine Computer science

Metrics

54
Cited By
0.86
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
0
Refs
0.69
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Life Sciences →  Neuroscience →  Cognitive Neuroscience
Speech and Audio Processing
Physical Sciences →  Computer Science →  Signal Processing

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Pure-tone intensity discrimination in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners

Anna C. SchroderDavid A. NelsonNeal E. Viemeister

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 1989 Vol: 85 (S1)Pages: S108-S108
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners

Jennifer J. LentzMarjorie R. Leek

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 2003 Vol: 113 (3)Pages: 1604-1616
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Modulation rate discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Ken W. GrantVan SummersMarjorie R. Leek

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 1996 Vol: 100 (4_Supplement)Pages: 2817-2817
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Amplitude modulation depth discrimination in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners

Stephan D. EwertJutta VolmerTorsten DauJesko L. Verhey

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 2008 Vol: 123 (5_Supplement)Pages: 3859-3859
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Sample discrimination of frequency by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners

Joshua M. AlexanderRobert A. Lutfi

Journal:   The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Year: 2008 Vol: 123 (1)Pages: 241-253
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.