JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) II and Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II aerosol measurements from 1994 to 1996

C. E. RandallR. M. BevilacquaJ. D. LumpeK. W. HoppelD. W. RuschE. P. Shettle

Year: 2000 Journal:   Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres Vol: 105 (D3)Pages: 3929-3942   Publisher: American Geophysical Union

Abstract

We describe statistical comparisons between version 6.0 Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) II and version 5.931 Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II measurements of aerosol extinction and derived surface area and volume density between 1994 and 1996. Qualitatively, both instruments show similar decay of the aerosol extinction at visible and near‐IR wavelengths in the altitude range from 12 to 30 km, resulting from dissipation of the Mount Pinatubo aerosols. We present quantitative differences between the SAGE II and POAM II extinctions at 1 and 0.45 μm for temporally and spatially coincident measurements. On average, for the moderately elevated aerosol extinction levels encountered in 1994, differences in the extinction measurements at 1 μm are within ±10% between 12 and 27 km, increasing at higher and lower altitudes. Differences at 0.45 μm are within ±35% between 13 and 30 km, increasing at lower altitudes. For the lower aerosol extinction conditions of 1995 and 1996, the comparisons indicate that systematic errors contributed to larger relative differences between the instruments. These effects are manifested as “asymmetries” in the Northern Hemisphere versus Southern Hemisphere comparisons, and in the 1 μm versus 0.45 μm comparisons. We suggest that these systematic differences are partly due to altitude registration errors in one or both of the instruments. Average volume densities derived using a principal component analysis technique agreed within about 10% at high northern latitudes between 16 and 27 km, and within about 30% at high southern latitudes. In most cases, surface area density differences were somewhat larger. Although a dedicated validation campaign was not feasible for POAM II, overall the results presented here confirm the validity of the POAM II aerosol measurements for scientific studies.

Keywords:
Aerosol Atmospheric sciences Environmental science Altitude (triangle) Extinction (optical mineralogy) Northern Hemisphere Latitude Ozone Polar Atmosphere (unit) Stratosphere Climatology Meteorology Chemistry Physics Geology Mineralogy

Metrics

26
Cited By
3.46
FWCI (Field Weighted Citation Impact)
31
Refs
0.91
Citation Normalized Percentile
Is in top 1%
Is in top 10%

Citation History

Topics

Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Physical Sciences →  Earth and Planetary Sciences →  Atmospheric Science
Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Physical Sciences →  Earth and Planetary Sciences →  Atmospheric Science
Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
Physical Sciences →  Environmental Science →  Global and Planetary Change

Related Documents

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) II stratospheric NO2, 1993–1996

C. E. RandallD. W. RuschR. M. BevilacquaK. W. HoppelJ. D. Lumpe

Journal:   Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres Year: 1998 Vol: 103 (D21)Pages: 28361-28371
© 2026 ScienceGate Book Chapters — All rights reserved.